This research study is on the analysis of the appraisal of revenue generation and expenditure system at the local government level. In so doing the study looked into various sources open to the Enugu South Local Government – external and internal sources and the expenditure pattern too.
Primary type of data is in the form of interviews, questionnaires were used in the research work also secondary data sourced from textbooks newspapers; articles, seminars, government publications were used for the study. Percentages and correlation co-efficient were used in data analysis.
After conducting the research it was found that:
(a)Little amount of revenue was generated internally.
(b)In the course of revenue drive taskforce comprising staff and council members yields more revenue to the local government.
However the local government faces numerous problems in her course of revenue drive.
(a)Inability to harness the entire revenue sources.
(b)Dishonesty among revenue agents.
Based on these problems the researcher made some recommendations on how they can increase her internally generated revenue. Among the recommendation made includes the local government should endeavour to properly update her property valuation ledgers. Also the institution of revenue court to curb tax evasion in order to increase the revenue availability to the local government to enable her to provide necessary services to the inhabitant and this contribute to the development of the economy and economic growth in general.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction 1
Literature Review 12
Research Methodology
Data Presentation
item by term 80
Summary of Findings, Conclusion and Recommendations
Bibliography 91
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
A local government according to Odenigwe (1977) is a system of local administration under which local communities and towns are organized to maintain law and order, provide public amenities and encourage the cooperation and participation of the inhabitants in joint endeavour towards the improvement of their condition of living. It provides the communities with a formal organizational framework, which enables them to conduct their affairs effectively and regulate the actions of their members for the general public good. The question that readily comes to mind is the issue of development of local government in Nigeria up to date, which is critically examined below.
During the colonial masters, local government has been conceptualized in various forms such as divisional administration, field administration, local government (Olowu (1989), development administration and council manager system (Gboyega (1987). The indirect rule system of the 1900 and multi-fier 1905 were most dominant in Nigeria. The indirect rule system a field administration model was introduced in 1916 by a nation wide ordinance promulgated by the colonial government first in Northern provinces and later in the Western and Eastern provinces. A model known as native administration system comprises of four main independent bodies namely.
The system was a child of necessity as the British has to adopt the system due to circumstances beyond their control; such circumstances are shortage of British manpower to service the vast area acquired by them, the problem of communication and desire to control local resistance to foreign rule. The system didn’t encourage popular participation; the emphasis was on colonial regulation of conquered people. The system had relative success in some part of Nigeria, like in the North, then partially in the West but in the East it was not successful.
After the Second World War, there was political development inside and outside Nigeria, which led to the abolition of indirect Rule system and it was replaced by the British with tier local government system, which there was full-grown system that will be efficient, participatory and relatively autonomous (Olowu 1989). The Eastern region brazed the trial in 1950 followed by Western in 1952, lastly by Northern in 1954 in the East they produce three tiers structure namely the country, the district and the local government council and its autonomous of on another. Further reformed was carried out in 1955, 1958 and 1960.
Membership of these councils were democratically elected although some traditional rulers were nominated as members of the council. An elected chairman presided over council meetings but on ceremonial occasions.
In 1966, when the military entered
1 - 5 of 96 Reviews |